What it is and where it came from
A relative ranking tool, not an automatic decision
ICE was popularized for growth-experiment prioritization by Sean Ellis and the GrowthHackers team. GrowthHackers' product documentation scores each dimension from 1 to 10 and averages the three estimates. Multiplication is a common later variant, not the only documented formula.
Source: GrowthHackers: Prioritizing your ideas with ICEDimensions
What each letter must make explicit
Impact
Expected effect on the goal metric if the idea works.
Guardrail: Anchor the score to a named metric and audience.
Confidence
Strength of evidence behind the expected impact.
Guardrail: Use research, prior tests, or observed behavior; enthusiasm is not evidence.
Ease
How quickly and cheaply the idea can be implemented and tested.
Guardrail: Include design, engineering, operations, dependencies, and measurement work.
Formula disclosure
Documented method and Hypotize method
(Impact + Confidence + Ease) ÷ 3
(Impact + Confidence + Ease) ÷ 3
The documented average and Hypotize produce the same 1–10 score. Multiplying the same inputs produces a 1–1000 variant. Multiplication and averaging are not generally order-equivalent: two ideas with the same sum can have different products, so teams should name the method they use.
Deterministic · No account required
Compare both calculations
Inputs stay in this browser. Nothing is sent to Hypotize by this calculator.
Documented source units
1 = minimal, 10 = very high
1 = weak evidence, 10 = strong evidence
1 = difficult, 10 = easy
Documented average
Hypotize input scale
Hypotize input, 1–10
Hypotize input, 1–10
Hypotize input, 1–10
Hypotize score
Multiplicative variant using these inputs: 336
Worked example
One experiment, reproducible arithmetic
Decision rules
When to use ICE, and when not to
Use it when
- You need to rank many growth ideas quickly.
- Impact and confidence can be discussed on a shared 1–10 rubric.
- Ease is a useful proxy for near-term execution cost.
Do not let it decide when
- Reach varies radically between ideas and must be explicit.
- Effort needs a real time or staffing unit.
- A regulatory, strategic, or dependency constraint overrides score order.
Common input failures
- Uncalibrated teams cluster every dimension around 7 or 8.
- Ease can reward small work over strategically important work.
- Confidence becomes optimism unless each score points to evidence.
Product behavior
Exactly what Hypotize does
Hypotize calculates the arithmetic mean and keeps the score on a 1–10 scale. The web app stores the framework and priority score; its dedicated MCP scoring operation is hypotize_ice_vote_upsert, which records the current user's 1–10 ICE vote and recalculates priority. The product does not use the multiplicative variant.
A score is one field in the experiment record. It does not execute a test, prove a hypothesis, or replace owner, state, evidence, outcome, learning, and next step.
Choose the right lens
The same pricing experiment in three rubrics
| Framework | Example inputs | Hypotize result | Best question |
|---|---|---|---|
| ICE | 8, 6, 7 | 7.00 | What is impactful, evidenced, and easy? |
| PIE | 8, 7, 6 | 7.00 | Which conversion opportunity matters? |
| RICE | 8, 7, 6, 3 | 112.00 | How much impact per unit of effort? |
Keep the context
A score is useful when its reasoning survives
Reviewed 29 August 2026. Source links identify the documented method; product behavior is derived from the current Hypotize framework configuration and calculator implementation.